🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our children's youth". A law may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," commented one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the local level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various figures to follow this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, further states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this global debate continues, the actions of Australia and others indicate that states globally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.